Quoting Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Donovan or Craig, can you please post it as a patch to the current > rsync > source (including an increase in the protocol version and checks to do > the > old behavior when talking to an old version client).
I'm not the person to do this, as I don't know the rsync code and protocol version stuff that well. I've been working on librsync instead. (handballs to Craig :-). I'm not sure what the best way of implementing the old behavior for talking to old versions would be. Perhaps implement a broken finalise in a seperate "mdfour-old.c" would be best. Then the the mdfour.[ch] can be common for librsync, rsync, and perhaps samba without including old broken cruft just for rsync. > Probably we wouldn't want to incorporate it until a major release > anyway > (2.6.0) but if it isn't developed soon and put into the "patches" > diretory > it's likely to be forgotten. I've put the patches against librsync up on the librsync SF page. After I migrate it and librsync to the RSA implementation API I'll be submitting it to libmd. It would be nice if we had standard md4sum code that every project could use/debug/fix. -- ABO -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
