I've never seen anybody suggest any other value for --modify-window than "2". Does 90 really work better than 2? My understanding is that PC-style filesystems do not have 1 second timestamp granularity and so round the times up or down slightly.
- Dave Dykstra On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 02:35:42PM -0800, Timothy Burt wrote: > > Glory Halelujah! > > I think I got it. > > It must have something to do with the file modification times and perhaps > the number of places of accuracy, perhaps in fractions of a second. > > When I add --modify-window=90 as a parameter. Then it works as it should. > > At least it does, for me now. You might try a smaller number (of seconds) > but for me. 90 seconds is close enough! > > On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Mike Rubel wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Timothy Burt wrote: > > > I am seeing similar symptoms. > > > > Hi Timothy, > > > > I'm trying to find out more about this. May I ask, are the files you see > > sent even when they haven't changed regular files, or directories, or > > both? > > > > Mike > > > > > > -- > -------------------- > Timothy Burt > General Manager > Arbor Group LLC > Los Angeles, Calif. USA > > -- > To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html