On 12 Jun 2003, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mind you, that means making the server lightweight with the > client doing all the logic and a nearly stateless connection. > Much like my earlier post on this thread posited.
I was wondering today if that would make it easier to gain confidence in the design's security. Making the semantics of an operation less dependent on a lot of accumulated state probably helps, all other things being equal. -- Martin -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
