What filesystem are you using? If you are using HFS or HFS+ I suggest you give UFS a try because it all the filesystem semantics are what unix tools expect. While I haven't seen your specific problem, I am sure there are quite a few situations where rsync and other unix tools will be confused on HFS.

Additionally, HFS and HFS+ store resource forks that rsync (and scp, amanda, tar, etc) won't see -- therefore your files are likely to be incomplete after being transferred with rsync or any other unix-level utility.

If you are using UFS, then the resource forks will be transferred ok, because MacOSX will store them as hidden files instead of resource forks (or data streams, as they are known in the Win32 world).

regards,





martin

Adam Behn wrote:

I'm just looking for some advice on a project I am currently working on.

I have two OS X servers and I am looking to use rsync to mirror data between
the two. I just love the fact that rsync only moves the data incrementally.



--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Reply via email to