Additionally, HFS and HFS+ store resource forks that rsync (and scp, amanda, tar, etc) won't see -- therefore your files are likely to be incomplete after being transferred with rsync or any other unix-level utility.
If you are using UFS, then the resource forks will be transferred ok, because MacOSX will store them as hidden files instead of resource forks (or data streams, as they are known in the Win32 world).
regards,
martin
Adam Behn wrote:
I'm just looking for some advice on a project I am currently working on.
I have two OS X servers and I am looking to use rsync to mirror data between the two. I just love the fact that rsync only moves the data incrementally.
-- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
