On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 06:04, jw schultz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 09:14:56AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote: [...] > I had thought so too but now i'm less sure. > > I put it up on October 26th -- for discussion. > In the next 14 days there were hits from 107 unique IPs, 73 > of which were in the first 4 days. Then it settled down to a > slow, declining, trickle that could have been naught but > robots. But no one said anything online or off. So on the > 8th of November i took it down. Now over two weeks after i > took it down and four since putting it up you are the first > person to even acknowledge it.
I had a look at it and thought it was good... > The intent was to, if there is interest, get feedback to > polish the document for placement on the web site. Or to > let someone who is perhaps a better writer take it over. > Not to self-publish the thing. Perhaps i had to high of > expectations but i expected at least one or two would say > something, even if it was just "yuck" or "its a start" > before knowledge of it subsided into archives. I didn't comment at the time because none of the above applied to me, and I was slack :-( > I'll put it back up if i hear more than just a whimper. At the time I read it I thought; good, something I can point people at when they ask me. I think it was a good resource. -- Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/ -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
