On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 07:48, Jason M. Felice wrote: > This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received > files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system > will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of > the file's name.
Does this mean it also automatically detects renames? > Anyone have an example of an MD4 collision so I can test that case? :) How do you recover from that case? > Patch Summary: > > -1 +1 Makefile.in > -0 +304 hashlink.c (new) > -1 +21 options.c > -0 +6 proto.h > -5 +21 receiver.c > -0 +6 rsync.c > -0 +7 rsync.h If this does everything I think it does, then it's a surprisingly small amount of changes for what it does. > > ______________________________________________________________________ -- Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/ -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
