John Van Essen wrote:
Off list to rsync list owner (feel free to reply on-list if you like):


On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

I'm not sure what the policy of this list is and I bet everyone has a spam
filter, so nobody might have noticed, but we got spammed.

The policy is to block as much spam as possible without blocking legitimate posts. A 100% solution is impossible, even if we had human moderation (humans make mistakes).

It seems that these posts got through during a surge of spam when the
filter hit its maximum-process limit.  During the day of the 24th more
than 60 spam messages to the list were blocked.

I got several.  Delivered to the mailing list from:

  cpe-24-243-54-175.satx.res.rr.com [24.243.54.175]
  unknown [219.252.105.93]
  unknown [218.59.89.16]
  unknown [200.159.206.55]


The first one has been in the dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net blacklist since Oct.
I use these 4 DNS-based blacklists in the mail server that I manage:

  sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
  list.dsbl.org
  dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
  web.dnsbl.sorbs.net

And they have helped a LOT.

The other 3 have no reverse DNS entries.  A machine with no reverse DNS
that is sending email is not very likely to be a legitimate email server.
It's much more likely a compromised machine on a clueless ISP's network.
Rejecting email from those unidentified machines also has helped a lot.

Using any of those measures alone tends to block legitimate posters, particularly those running their own mail server, which to my mind is a greater harm than letting ocassional spam go through. Our purpose here is to run a mailing list, not punish ISPs. So we use all the things you named as part of a weighted score.

--
Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Reply via email to