Hi. > After trying this a bit, I now think it would read better to use 3-digit > octal escaping.
I would be perfectly fine with that. And octal is probably more in the line of how escaping is traditionally done. As long as I can process the files in the log, I'm all for it. Btw, will this change make it into a later rsync version (2.4.7?) ? I would rather not depend on using a custom patched rsync, but if it will become a standard feature at some point it feels less hacky. ;) Anyway, thanks. :) Vidar -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
