lsk wrote:
>But I have tried various options including --inplace,--no-whole-file etc., >for last few weeks but all the results show me removing the destination >server oracle datafiles and after that doing an "rsync -vz" from source is >faster than copying(rsyncing) over the old files that are present in >destination. > > Please do try applying the patch in "patches/dynamic_hash.diff" to both sides (well, it's probably only necessary for the sending machine, but no matter) and making this check again. This patch is meant to address precisely your predicament. Shachar -- ///**** lsk > Hi which issue does this patch address ? it is for -- inplace or for ,--no-whole-file transfer of oracle datafiles. Where can I get this patch ? Thanks, lsk. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-4TB-datafiles...--t1318624.html#a3534475 Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html