On 2/24/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 07:59:32PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > However, when processing files inside, it blindly follows the obsolete > symlink and concludes that the files are already there, whereas the > newly created directory would have no files on a real run.
My mistake. Now I see that after pretending to delete the symlink, rsync sets statret = -1. That causes it to set missing_below three lines later. Is my other example with an implied symlink valid against the current CVS rsync? Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
