On 7/16/07, Andreas Kotes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
seems like they've implemented something similiar TCP on top of UDP
which does a seriously better job (the information they provide points
in that direction).

I'm wondering whether MTP is simply a better stream protocol (so that
rsync, could be run over an MTP connection and probably perform
similarly to syncdat) or to what extent it relies on the
parallelizability of a large file transfer to contain the effects of
packet loss.  There's some information at
http://www.dataexpedition.com/downloads/DEI-MTP-Info.pdf and
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7158479-claims.html .

Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Reply via email to