On 9/30/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is some files don't change in size. So I was hoping that the > checksums could be cached. Perhaps I'm mistaken but I thought the checksum > determined what actual blocks were transferred. I suppose it could be > cached at either storage location.
I still do not understand what you are proposing; please be more specific! Which checksums are you talking about: (1) the whole-file checksums of destination files used by the -c option to decide whether to transfer each file, or (2) the block checksums of destination files used by the delta-transfer algorithm to match blocks, or (3) something else? At what point in the process would the cache be read, and at what point would it be updated? Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
