On 10/16/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It also allows for > future expansion in certain situations -- e.g. I can imagine making a > future version of --prune-empty-dirs and/or --delay-updates compatible > with inc-recursion, and this will allow a more modern rsync to try to > tell a remote receiver to use that option and stay in inc_recurse mode, > and the receiver can say "no, I don't support that".
In this situation, automatically disabling incremental recursion would be better than exiting with an error that really isn't the user's fault. (That's why I said "negotiate".) Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
