On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:04:48PM +0100, Rolf Grossmann wrote: > attached is the version of the flags patch, that is based on the one > I'm using
Your patch calls chflags(file,0) on every file/dir that is going to be removed or renamed. Does that slow things down at all? My current flags patch tries to only call chflags() on the files that need it, but it that code is only active if the user is preserving flags, so the forceful chflags() call may be a better choice, assuming that things aren't significantly slowed down by that. That change for every rename seems a little more doubtful, as it seems like it would always turn off all chflags on renamed files when the --fileflags option isn't specified. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
