https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5607
------- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-10 17:01 CST ------- As the thread that Matt pointed out mentions, -e is completely safe as long as the command has the --server option. The rrsync script requires it to be the first option on the command-line, which is an easy check and works for normal cases (and can even work with someone who is passing --rsync-path="rsync --options" as long as the user specifies their own --server option as the first option). One thing that rsync 3 could be improved to do is to omit that "e..." sequence if --protocol=29 is specified. That would at least make it easy for a user to communicate with an overly restrictive server that won't update their software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
