On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:10:23 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: [...] > I > guess one could still make the argument that the ACLs should be copied > exactly.
That would be my assertion. Regardless of the reason for the mask being present - added by the user or required by the file system - the default behavior of -A should be to copy the mask (and all the rest) faithfully. > > I found a bigger problem: rsync seems to use the mask permissions as the > group permissions, potentially granting undesired access. Yes! Just to confirm: I get the same result when I run this test. [...] > > http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-October/016400.html > > I'll have to reread that thread. Small world. That was a previous attempt to rejoin the users of the public rsync version. - Andrew -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
