On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 21:13 -0400, Lee Winter wrote: > The purpose of this note is to inquire about your collective interest > in optimizing rsync for certain uses, particularly atomic, > unidirectional transfers with few or single writer and many, often > very many, readers. > > After studying the requirements and the documentation on samba.org I > have reached the tentative conclusion that serious improvements can be > obtained with a few small tweaks and one medium-sized internal change.
Would you care to elaborate to attract more comments? -- Matt -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
