Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:45 +0800, Thomas Gutzler wrote: >> Thanks everyone for your help, I've got what I want. >> >> My first attempt has been >> --include="*/" --include="*.foo" --include="*.bar" >> --include="/this_dir/***" --exclude="*" >> which did nothing than *.foo and *.bar. Shuffling it around, I found that >> --include="*/" --include="/this_dir/***" --include="*.foo" >> --include="*.bar" --exclude="*" >> does what I want and it even makes sense. > > Those two commands should be equivalent. If you have a reproducible > case in which they aren't, please share it and we can see if there's a > bug.
Going through my history, I found that I must have accidentally put a whitespace between '--include' and '=' which wasn't very obvious at the time thanks to the line wrapping of my terminal. I should have used an include file instead :) So no, no bugs. Tom -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
