On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Carlos Carvalho <car...@fisica.ufpr.br>wrote:
> It seems the latest timeout changes in 3.1 work well. > Great to hear! It's nice to know that a 3.1.0 receiver is indeed helping to keep things alive that used to die, even without 3.1.0 on the sending side (which is exactly what I was hoping for). A 3.1.0 sender also helps to keep a non-3.1.0 receiver going, as some testing I'm doing at work has proven (0 timeouts when doing some --dry-run difference-finding runs over about 7 TB of files to each of 30 mirrors -- that's a huge improvement). I'm liking the new 3.1.0 I/O and timeout code a lot. ..wayne..
-- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
