On Tue, 17 May 2011, Matt McCutchen wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 10:54 -0700, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> > 
> > Abstracting the core functionality into a librsync.so would be really 
> > spiffy too...
> 
> All easy to say, harder to do (and maintain).  I'm thankful that rsync 
> meets my needs right now, and that Wayne has gotten as many bugs out of 
> it as he has over the last few years.

Agreed. I mostly meant that as tongue-in-cheek. Creating librsync.so seems 
about as hard (or harder) as multi-threading.

..Ch:W..


-- 
"An idea does not gain truth as it gains followers." Amanda Bloom
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Reply via email to