On Tue, 17 May 2011, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 10:54 -0700, Chuck Wolber wrote: > > > > Abstracting the core functionality into a librsync.so would be really > > spiffy too... > > All easy to say, harder to do (and maintain). I'm thankful that rsync > meets my needs right now, and that Wayne has gotten as many bugs out of > it as he has over the last few years.
Agreed. I mostly meant that as tongue-in-cheek. Creating librsync.so seems about as hard (or harder) as multi-threading. ..Ch:W.. -- "An idea does not gain truth as it gains followers." Amanda Bloom -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
