> While you're at it, why not a more generic > --ignore-errno foo > where foo is (a defined subset of) the Posix error numbers > listed in errno(3). The names, alternately, could be > used. > > So your application would use > > --ignore-errno EACCES
Karl, I love this suggestion, and will do it this way if there is consensus. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
