https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
--- Comment #3 from Kilian CAVALOTTI <[email protected]> 2013-05-03 20:12:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > what result does remote scp vs local-copy-on-sshfs give (i.e what is the > impact > of sshfs) ? They are the comparable, the impact of sshfs is minimal. I used the same SSH options to conduct the test over a 10GbE link, and checked the speed of the transfer using the NIC counters. I can't reproduce the tests right now, but on top of my head, the numbers were: - pure scp: about 130MB/s - cp /sshfsmount/path/to/file /tmp/file: about 130MB/s - rsync host0:/path/to/file /tmp/file: about 130MB/s - rsync /sshfsmount/path/to/file /tmp/file: about 80MB/s -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
