On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:30:58 -0800, Linda A. Walsh wrote: > Was there some reason that patch got dropped?
AFAIK it was never applied in the first place. I disagree with the reasoning, but whatever. This just came up this morning on Gentoo: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475408 ..and as I looked for solutions that don't require the patch I found: https://github.com/Feh/nocache This seems to work and is useful to other applications as well, if you can live with the naive assumption that buffer cache behaviour is global to an entire application/command. -h -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
