https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13222
--- Comment #3 from Urban Mueller <muel...@relog.ch> --- Thanks for the fix, that will solve my problem. However I think the planned -c behaviour is surprising in a bad way. If rsync has a way to achieve its desired target state, IMHO it should. Example: If the target directory is writable but contains a file owned by root with mode 600 (ie not writable by normal users), rsync -ac will happily replace it if a normal user transfers a file with the same name. However if the file has a nearly identical time stamp and is otherwise identical with the source, he suddenly gets a warning every time he tries to copy? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
