https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13445
--- Comment #4 from Einhard Leichtfuß <algu...@respiranto.de> --- Did I understand correctly that you were able to reproduce this in a notably different way? I had not sufficiently examined the code to see that in all the other cases the existance of a directory is made sure before. At least under this precondition, I like your idea to add such a flag. However, wouldn't it then be consequent to also use flags in order to say when a file may not exist at all? Again, I have not thoroughly read the whole code, however I presume there are cases (also, if !am_sender) where the existance of a file (being a directory) is assumed and a violation of this assumption causes trouble and hence should not be ignored. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html