https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14126
--- Comment #2 from Chris Brannon <c...@prgmr.com> --- (In reply to Paul Slootman from comment #1) That was, in fact, my first try. exit $? >> 8 is recommended for Perl by some sources on the net. However, if the called program gets a signal, "exit $? >> 8" would cause atomic-rsync to exit 0, which is also not the right thing. There are other correct solutions to this problem, but I think the simplest and most expedient is exit 1, especially given that atomic-rsync has been exiting 0 under failure conditions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
