On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 13:32 +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On 2007-09-06, Rainer Gerhards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > http://rgerhards.blogspot.com/2007/09/rsyslog-config-again.html
> >
> > I would deeply appreciate any feedback on the samples and format
> > suggestions.
> 
> /me thinks you're getting way too little feedback on the blog, 
> or this list. Unfortunately I don't have much more than simple
> preference to contribute here..
> 
> XML-based format: 
> 
>       Yikes, you'll need an additional human readable frontend
>       format that's converted to XML for it to be usable. You
>       can't expect us poor sysadmins to be editing XML
>       directly to configure rsyslogd.. 

The nice piece of this is that it is machine parseable easily  which
enables lots of useful editors.

> 
> syslog-ng like:
>       
>       Fair enough.. It works for my usage.

The syntax is okay but at that point what distinguishes b/t syslog-ng
and rsyslog?


> Apache like:
> 
>       Not sure I understand this.. Seems like a mix of option/value
>       and xml'ish for some functionality.

This one I'm more interested in. If you think of each log like a vhost
and you define the qualities that are added to that inside the
definition

<Log mylogofsilliness>
  Destination /path/to/silly.log
  DestinationMode 0640
  DestinationOwner root
  DestinationGroup log-readers
  Include mail.info kern.debug cron.emerg
</Log>

etc, etc, etc

maybe that doesn't make sense, maybe it does - it is pretty easy to
read, though.

-sv
   

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog

Reply via email to