> I will now change the default starting in the beta (3.16.2). I'll also
> schedule this feature for removal - maybe with 4.x.

Ummmm... of course, I meant 3.17.4 (3.16 is the current stable).

> Rainer
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RB
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:29 AM
> > To: rsyslog-users
> > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] imklog symbol translation
> >
> > >  now supports the translation natively, I would even recommend to
> > DROP
> > >  the code altogether (maybe after some period of being off by
> > default).
> > >  That would also result in a good cleanup of MOST of the imklog
> code
> > (and
> > >  code, as I said, that actually belongs to a different computing
> > domain).
> >
> > I guess my question would be what valid reasons there could be for
> > retaining the functionality, turned off or not.  Appropriately
placed
> > or not, could anyone provide justification for leaving that bit in?
> > If the end result is getting rid of it, turning it off by default
may
> > be a start but should come with a hard deadline of complete removal
-
> > we all know how unused code rots.
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsyslog mailing list
> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog

Reply via email to