On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 08:40, Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]> wrote: > The more I think about it, the more it smells like a real bug. Has anyone > objections changing the default?
None. It is unrealistic (and generally unusable) to have UNIX directory permissions without the execute bit (S_IX*). The only reason to do it would be to have an 'archive' directory of sorts, in which users may see names of children, but none of their permissions or contents. As has been noted, the only reason it's worked thus far is that most people either change the default or run the daemon as root, for whom those permissions aren't really a limiting factor. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
