It works just fine without tls. I do not know much about tls, is there a 
default size somewhere that I can swizzle?

Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> Can 1 be a tls (lib) artifact? Can you try with plain tcp?
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
> Von: "Rory Toma" <[email protected]>
> An: "rsyslog-users" <[email protected]>
> Gesendet: 08.12.09 20:39
> Betreff: [rsyslog] Help with client config
>
> I have a client config as follows, running on armv4, rsyslog 4.4.2 (I 
> can't get anything newer to compile due to the atomic kernel support not 
> wanting to compile) The problem I'm having is:
>
> 1) (this is probably an rtfm, but I'll ask it anyway) It seems that my 
> logs being sent over the network are being batched up in huge packets, I 
> see one transaction for a bunch of data. Sometimes this means my logs 
> are delayed quite a bit.
>
> 2) Sometimes, the client just doesn't send out over the network at all 
> (verified with a tcpdump), but continues logging.
>
> Any suggestions or config file tweaks welcome.
>
> thx
>
> Here is my config:
>
> $DefaultNetStreamDriverCAFile /etc/ca.pem
>
> $DefaultNetStreamDriver gtls
> $ActionSendStreamDriverMode 1
> $ActionSendStreamDriverAuthMode anon
>
> $WorkDirectory /var/log
>
> $ActionQueueType LinkedList
> $ActionQueueFileName rsyslog-fwd
> $ActionResumeRetryCount -1
> $ActionQueueSaveOnShutdown on
> $ActionQueueMaxDiskSpace 256k
>
> $ModLoad imuxsock
> $SystemLogSocketName /var/log/log
> $OptimizeForUniprocessor on
>
> $outchannel locallog,/var/log/locallog,262144,/usr/bin/rotate_locallog
>
> *.* @@foo.bar.com:80
> *.* $locallog
>
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com
>   

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to