> I don't really have a problem with forward references, but I think my > objection is more to the fact that its an input that is declaring its > ruleset, whereas I think it would be more logical to bind inputs to > rulesets. ie, declare your inputs, your templates, your filters, and > your actions, and tie them all together using rulesets.
mhhh... Good that you bring up this point. To me it looks much more natural that the input specifies its "sink". I actually hadn't thought the other way round. Now after reading your post, I realize that it is actually either way. Let me think a little bit about this (BTW: I am out of office tomorrow, so silence on my part doesn't mean diminishing interest ;)). I'll driving out shortly, but I hope to be able to look and reply to mail later this evening. In any case, now I have something to think about during the drive ;) Thanks, Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
