> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ales Kozumplik > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 1:11 PM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] log forwarding through unix sockets > > Based on my own tests, I believe that 'imuxsock' and 'imudp' use > > different logic to parse incoming messages. 'imuxsock' always assumes > > That's exactly my feeling about this.
I elaborated on that yesterday -- not sure if you saw that posting. > I just think one either should be > able to tell every input module what format should be expected (instead > of letting rsyslogd try some guessing method), or that every input > module should by default understand a standard "officially recommended" > forwarding format. The problem is that syslog() does not emit the format recommended by RFC3164, so no message provided over that channel includes a hostname. Things would be heavily broken if I would simply ignore that fact. Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
