> Starting this morning I have begun to wade in-depth through a pile of CEE
> docs (the upcoming standard). We may need to make some format adjustments,
> but I'd like to stick with somewhat as simple as possible to write for the
> samples.

        Do you have a link to the CEE documentation for the upcoming
standard?  I'd be interested in taking a look.

> >   Will the log formats,  that is,  what to look for,
> > be in a seperate text file that can be updated?   As you mention in the
> > blog post,  "much like a virus scanner".
> 
> Actually, at this point nothing is really finalized. For the initial effort,
> it will definitely be a text file. But in the long term I can also envision
> that we should be able to pull it e.g. from web servers or load multiple
> files, or... actually something that should be configurable.

        IMHO,  I think leaving it a text file would be best.   Let some 
other process (wget,  whatever) pull the definitions.   Or let the user
do it manually.   Again,  IMHO,   I think having the actual library pull
the definitions might be outside of the scope.   
> 
> > If that is the case,  will programs that use liblognorm pull that into
> > an array first,  and let liblognorm do it's work?  Or will this file
> > have to be repeatedly referenced?
> 
> In the long term I think it makes sense to provide a way to stuff samples in
> via either a dedicated API OR (and?) have them loaded based on a config file.
> The latter is what I have on my mind for the first step.

        Sounds great.

> > I'd love to help out in this,  be it code wise and/or log examples.
> 
> Any help is deeply appreciated and these questions already help! Log samples
> and trying out the library, once it materializes, would be a very very great
> aid. 
> 
> I will write a couple of more blog posts with more details, and everything is
> really open for change now. It would also be very useful if you could spread
> the news. An as wide audience as possible would be very good.

        Sounds great as well.  I know on this end of the wire,  you've
already got one beta tester :)  I'm really itching to try it out,  but I
know it's not even near that point!   I'll be more than happy to help
out where I can (code,  log examples, etc). 

-- 
        Champ Clark III | Softwink, Inc | 800-538-9357 x 101
                     http://www.softwink.com

GPG Key ID: 58A2A58F
Key fingerprint = 7734 2A1C 007D 581E BDF7  6AD5 0F1F 655F 58A2 A58F
If it wasn't for C, we'd be using BASI, PASAL and OBOL.

Attachment: pgpVLWL5ofNOg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to