I have just written another post on the normalization library. It looks like the design tends to favor a split into two libraries:
http://blog.gerhards.net/2010/10/splitting-up-normalization-library.html Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 9:01 AM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] liblognorm vs. libeventnorm > > I would like to add as an argument pro liblognorm, that many people > probably > better understand what "log normalization" is whereas "event > normalization" > may sound strange. In that sense, liblognorm may be a better name. > Feedback > is appreciated. > > Rainer > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards > > Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 11:53 AM > > To: rsyslog-users > > Subject: [rsyslog] liblognorm vs. libeventnorm > > > > Hi all, > > > > I think I'll start with the libeventnorm name for the normalizing > > library > > instead of liblognorm. Reason here: > > > > http://blog.gerhards.net/2010/10/liblognorm-or-libeventnorm.html > > > > Further name suggestions or arguments are very welcome! > > > > Rainer > > _______________________________________________ > > rsyslog mailing list > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > http://www.rsyslog.com > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
