hello john and thanks for the tip however, we had already tried it the guy in charge of the server claims it caused a significant decrease in bind performance
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:01 PM, John Feuerstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > just curious... why don't you let bind use syslog() directly, e.g. > receiving the messages with rsyslog locally using imuxsock. Then let > rsyslog write it to your local file (if needed) and additionally send it > to the remote host? Does the file input module really make sense for a > service that can log to syslog? > > For example, here is part of my bind logging config: > > logging { > channel default { > syslog local0; > severity debug; > }; > channel query { > syslog local1; > severity debug; > }; > category default { default; }; > category general { default; }; > category queries { query; }; > }; > > Best regards, > John > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
