OK, so this is not the issue. We are trying to reproduce the issue, I hope that will work thanks to your detailled report. I guess you will hear back on monday.
Raienr > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Dražen Kacar > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 3:18 PM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] SIGSEGV because of double free in msgDestruct > > Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > Thanks for the excellent bug report. I have one idea based on a case > I had in > > the past. Can it be that Centos GCC version does not properly support > atomic > > instructions or is set to an to-old version? > > That has crossed my mind as well and I've checked generated config.h > which > contains: > > /* Define if compiler provides atomic builtins */ > /* #undef HAVE_ATOMIC_BUILTINS */ > > /* Define if compiler provides 64 bit atomic builtins */ > /* #undef HAVE_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_64BIT */ > > So I thought the mutexes were being used and everything was fine with > that. > > > I have one other case open, and > > I think it was on centos. If atomics do no work right, nothing works > well at > > all in rsyslog. > > You mean that the #ifdef directives which fall back to mutex locking > aren't good enough? > > > Note that the build system seems to be unable to correctly > > detect this, as can be seen in this bug tracker here: > > > > http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202 > > Well, even if the configure check is not correct, it doesn't exibit > false > positive in my case. > > > Could you please rebuild it with -march=i586 added to the CFLAGS. If > my idea > > is right, it will probably run with that. > > I've tried and now config.h contains: > > /* Define if compiler provides atomic builtins */ > #define HAVE_ATOMIC_BUILTINS 1 > > /* Define if compiler provides 64 bit atomic builtins */ > #define HAVE_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_64BIT 1 > > However, it still crashes in the same way. > > -- > .-. .-. Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely > (_ \ / _) ceremonial. > | > | [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
