All: I'll probably create a dedicated liblogging list soon -- sorry for the
noise

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Champ Clark III [Softwink]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 4:38 PM
> To: rsyslog-users
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Strange liblognorm issue(s)...
> 
> > Yes, that would be excellent! While I still have a backlog, I hope to
> be able
> > to focus on liblognorm, libee, libestr and its integration into
> rsyslog the
> > next few weeks.
> >
> > BTW: if you have suggestions for parsers (like ipv4), please let me
> know. In
> > order to prevent false positives, I definitely need to write a couple
> of more
> > specific parsers (probably one of the next things to do).
> 
>       Pulled down the latest git,  and tested.  Worked great :)  I'm
> not sure if it's in there yet,  but a ipv6 will probably be requested
> at
> some point.   I'll let you know if I run into anything.

IPv6 is definitely something needed. I think also a couple of date formats.
The quality and speed of the normalization process greatly depends on the
parsers. I hopefully will find time to write a paper on the method used, then
it will become clear. But it is very important to have good parsers *and*
priorites in which they are used (priorities are on the todo list as well).

Rainer
> 
> --
>         Champ Clark III | Softwink, Inc | 800-538-9357 x 101
>                      http://www.softwink.com
> 
> GPG Key ID: 58A2A58F
> Key fingerprint = 7734 2A1C 007D 581E BDF7  6AD5 0F1F 655F 58A2 A58F
> If it wasn't for C, we'd be using BASI, PASAL and OBOL.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to