Hi all,
Any word on the merging of this patch into the main code base, given
that no further opposing arguments were given in the mailing list?
Ariel P.
Server Security Analyst
HostDime.com, Inc.
On 2010-12-22 13:07, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
Hi all,
thanks to Ariel for the hard work. I, too, think that all concerns are
addressed. I intend to merge the patch when I am back in January if I don't
here any good argument why I should not ;)
Rainer
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ariel P.
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 11:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Feedback on ommysql requested
I have created a new version of my patch, which creates two
configuration settings for ommysql.
The first setting sets the path for the 'my.cnf' file. If this setting
is not specified in the configuration file, the mysql library is not
informed of a file path (current behavior)
The second setting is used to change the section of the 'my.cnf' file
to
use, which defaults to "client" if not specified in the configuration
file (this is mysql standard behavior).
Please see [ http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213#c3 ] for
details.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com
