> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Biebl > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 1:18 AM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] rsyslog 6.1.3 (v6-devel) released > > 2011/2/1 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>: > > Hi David, > > > > thanks for putting this straight. It was actually my fault not to > tell Tom > > this for v6. I think the release cycle was a bit too long, too many > new > > features. I also think I need to concentrate on v6 now for new > features -- > > going back and forth between v5 and v6 for development releases is > sometimes > > quite confusing, at least to me ;) > > A stable release with the systemd bits included would be nice.
Yeah, that's right. Let me check what the current betas say... > > If you concentrate on v6, does that mean that getting 5.7.x stable and > ready for 5.8 is less on your focus? No! The "for new features" part of my reply is important. In fact, if I concentrate on v6 for new features, this helps with getting the stable versions out sooner. Actually, having "two and a half" devel builds (some v4, full v5 and v6) takes up quite some time, as I regularly need to change code that I just developed. If I develop new things on v6 only, I save that time (and that's quite a bit). This also means debugging only on v6. Plus it is easier to track mentally which codebase I work with. Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
