On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:11 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 2. a wierd, out of the box thought (in the 90% as good for 20% effort
> category)
>
> rather than tring to modify the running config, how about forking the main
> thread, having the old main thread close the inputs, and the new main thread
> 'shutdown' all it's other threads, then the new main thread can treat this
> as something very close to a normal startup (basically modulo privilage drop
> issue)
>
> you could either let the old process/threads run until they finish
> delivering all their messages, or you could have them deliver the messages
> to the new main thread (the former is probably the easiest, the question is
> are there more corner cases with both sets of threads outputting to the same
> destinations, or with potentially mishandling messages that were already
> processed in the old copy that would have been processed differently in the
> new copy)

I've tried to do this with other software - it's a PAIN.  Effectively
you have to transfer the memory state between threads/processes.  It's
not easy.

Honestly, config reload is less error prone.

-Aaron
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to