Hi Rainer,

it will take me some time to set this up, but I guess that is the way to go...

In the meantime syslog crashed while the debug log was running, but 
unfortunately it seems like there is nothing interesting in there.
I still post it, just in case it tells you something...

The core dump again contains "(...)ITICAL> Socket bind error, errno=50: Cannot 
assign requested add(...)"

Best regards
Ole


(...)
5401.988709000:4: --------<NSDSEL_PTCP> calling select, active fds (max 36): 8 
9 11 19 32 36
5401.988737200:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 138268: pszRcvBuf 0, lenRcvBuf 0
5401.988745400:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 856f0: pszRcvBuf 0, lenRcvBuf 0
5401.988753400:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 160ff8: pszRcvBuf 6b9e28, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988761300:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 177408: pszRcvBuf 1be080, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988768800:4: GnuTLS requested retry of 2 operation - executing
5401.988776100:4: retrying gtls recv, nsd: 177408
5401.988785800:4: GnuTLS receive requires a retry (this most probably is OK and 
no error condition)
5401.988793900:4: gtlsRecordRecv return. nsd 177408, iRet -2100, lenRcvd -28, 
lenRcvBuf -1, ptrRcvBuf 359
5401.988804900:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 138268: pszRcvBuf 0, lenRcvBuf 0
5401.988812900:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 856f0: pszRcvBuf 0, lenRcvBuf 0
5401.988820700:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 160ff8: pszRcvBuf 6b9e28, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988828500:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 177408: pszRcvBuf 1be080, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988836400:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 15ecd0: pszRcvBuf 607150, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988844200:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 1409a8: pszRcvBuf 1b9040, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988852100:4: --------<NSDSEL_PTCP> calling select, active fds (max 36): 8 
9 11 19 32 36
5401.988880100:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 138268: pszRcvBuf 0, lenRcvBuf 0
5401.988888300:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 856f0: pszRcvBuf 0, lenRcvBuf 0
5401.988896300:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 160ff8: pszRcvBuf 6b9e28, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988904300:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 177408: pszRcvBuf 1be080, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988911700:4: GnuTLS requested retry of 2 operation - executing
5401.988919000:4: retrying gtls recv, nsd: 177408
5401.988928700:4: GnuTLS receive requires a retry (this most probably is OK and 
no error condition)
5401.988936900:4: gtlsRecordRecv return. nsd 177408, iRet -2100, lenRcvd -28, 
lenRcvBuf -1, ptrRcvBuf 359
5401.988947700:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 138268: pszRcvBuf 0, lenRcvBuf 0
5401.988955700:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 856f0: pszRcvBuf 0, lenRcvBuf 0
5401.988963500:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 160ff8: pszRcvBuf 6b9e28, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988971300:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 177408: pszRcvBuf 1be080, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988979100:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 15ecd0: pszRcvBuf 607150, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988986900:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 1409a8: pszRcvBuf 1b9040, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.988994800:4: --------<NSDSEL_PTCP> calling select, active fds (max 36): 8 
9 11 19 32 36
5401.989022800:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 138268: pszRcvBuf 0, lenRcvBuf 0
5401.989031000:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 856f0: pszRcvBuf 0, lenRcvBuf 0
5401.989038900:4: hasRcvInBuffer on nsd 160ff8: pszRcvBuf 6b9e28, lenRcvBuf -1
5401.989046


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Rainer Gerhards
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Mai 2011 12:02
An: rsyslog-users
Betreff: Re: [rsyslog] Heavy stability problems when using TLS

I forgot to mention:

> Well, I think the key thing is try to setup some lab where the crashes
happen
> as well. I guess it is either message-induced or induced by some 
> issues in Solaris threading. Maybe it helps if you record traffic 
> (from sufficient
> sources) and replay it against a Linux box. If that one crashes, we 
> have
more
> options. If it does not crash, this does not directly point us to
something,
> unfortunately...

What I am looking for is some better information on when the crash happens.
So valgrind is often a good choice to check if there are some violations. Not 
sure, though, if that's available on Solaris.

Rainer
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to