> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rory Toma
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 8:55 AM
> To: rsyslog-users
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Question on host failover
> 
> I need to check, but I believe that may be an issue. I'll have to check my
> kernel/toolchain, and the configure output. I know there was a time frame
> when stable rsyslog did not compile due to this issue, and then I assumed
> that it had been removed when it started to compile again. I'll check
> tomorrow.

Well, I and others have done quite some work on the atomics replacements, and
they should work and work reasonably efficient in the current builds.
However, this is not used very often, and this is why I immediately consider
this as a region to look at...

Rainer

> 
> thx
> 
> On 5/31/2011 11:51 PM, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> >> I also don't recall if I mentioned this, but this is also on ARM.
> > I assume everything else works well? I am asking because I want to make
> sure
> > we do not have problems with atomic instructions replacements.
> >
> > Rainer
> >> On 5/31/2011 11:48 PM, Rory Toma wrote:
> >>> That did not work, either. Is this behaviour compiled in by default,
> >>> or is there a compile/config time flag that I need to set?
> >>>
> >>> On 5/31/2011 11:24 PM, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> >>>> Sorry, I was so focused on the bug (which existed anyway) that I did
> >>>> not notice the config problem. You need to use this directive in a
> >>>> rule chain. So this should work:
> >>>>
> >>>> *.* @@<machine>:110
> >>>> $ActionExecOnlyWhenPreviousIsSuspended on&   @@<machine>:143
> >>>> $ActionExecOnlyWhenPreviousIsSuspended off
> >>>>
> >>>> Note that the second filter has been replaced by an "&" which means
> >>>> that the actions are chained (and using the same filter).
> >>>>
> >>>> Please let me know if that solves the issue (note that on older v5
> >>>> builds this does NOT work due to the bug).
> >>>>
> >>>> Rainer
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rsyslog mailing list
> >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> >> http://www.rsyslog.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsyslog mailing list
> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > http://www.rsyslog.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to