On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 4:20 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jul 2011, [email protected] wrote: > >> I've been doing a few basic remote rsyslog services for a few months with >> mostly >> good results. >> >> Now we want to have dozens of servers all log many different services to a >> central >> log server. Each service has its own set of challenges due to varying >> levels of >> syslog compatibility/compliance, but my main, simple (stupid?) question >> is...what >> do you do about the fact that there aren't really enough different, unique >> facilities to go around for all the different logs you want to keep? > > facility based logging is insufficient for just about any serious logging > project. personally I act as if facility doesn't exist at all (and > frequently act as if severity doesn't exist) > That is the same approach I've taken in my logging projects, I share your opinion on this David.
I used tags and filters on the other hand to achieve that, completely ignoring facilities and severity. -Sivan _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
