On 02.11.2011 22:31, Andreas Piesk wrote: > >> sounds very interesting (and probably explains why I haven't seen it so far). >> I need to review the code, it's quite a while since I looked at that place >> the last time, seems it has "worked" for a couple of years. I'll do so later >> today and let you know the findings. We may need to further instrument/try >> out some patches...
Rainer, have you found some time to look at the issue? what about the idea to use one mutex for both operations? i mean, wouldn't replacing the mutexes mutLoadUnload and mutObjGlobalOp with a single mutex, type PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE, solve the problem? regards, -ap _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
