> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Radu Gheorghe > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 10:08 AM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Load balancing for rsyslog aggregators > > Thanks a lot, David. These solutions seem much better than DNS round > robin. > > @Rainer: I'm having trouble with setting up more exact performance > tests, but the system is supposed to scale to something like 50K > messages per second. And I just assumed that one sever won't handle I do 100kmsgs/second on a 2 year old travel notebook regularly, even in a vmware environment with just an "old" intel duo-core notebook processor... ;)
Rainer > the load, especially since these machines are slow. > > But you have a good point, because the external program inserts these > logs in ElasticSearch. And I have ElasticSearch on the same server > right now, which I don't have to. Using a dedicated server for Rsyslog > only might not cut it in the long run, but it would probably work well > for a while. More than enough for me to set up a cluster :D > > So, thanks again. I consider the issue "solved". > > Best regards, > Radu > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
