> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of David Lang
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 12:21 PM
> To: rsyslog-users
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Splitting and filtering Cisco logs
> 
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> 
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcin Miroslaw
> 
> >> I've forgot about links to docs.
> >> http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=424447&seqNum=2
> >>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa70/system/message/logms
> >> gs.html#wp1019931
> >
> > Excellent!
> >>
> >> but I'm not familiar with Cisco, please don't ask too difficult
> >> questions;)
> > At this point, we really don't need to understand what the message
> means. I asked for the doc so that I can lookup what type of parameter
> to expect (it's syntax). This is what mmnormalize is concerned about.
> 
> I am pretty familiar with Cisco logs, so I should be able to help
> 
> The problem is that the format of any particular log message does not
> correlate
> with the other, similar log messages. In the past when I've had to deal
> with
> them, I've had to setup a parser for each message code.
> 
> The good news is that the messages are well behaved at that point, so
> once you
> identify the %ASA number, you know exactly what the rest of the message
> means.

I plan to do some tutorial (either in print or as a video [time saver...]) with 
that as a sample. I think normalization is becoming even more important with 
CEE being around. I hope to get things started next week and will definitely 
ask all questions that come up :)

RAiner
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to