> > > You can put queue.type="linkedlist" within the action. That would > > make > > > an > > > action queue that would be specific for that action. > > > > > > If you want to define a different incoming queue per ruleset... I > > don't > > > know how to do that. At least not from the top of my head. But I > can > > > try to > > > find out if you need that and nobody else comes up with a > suggestion. > > > > I put it on my todo list. It may be that I overlooked that case. > > Usually not a problem, but I modeled (by intention) the ruleset() > > construct so that the legacy ruleset directives can not be used to > > modify the new-style object. Will try to find an answer (and > solution, > > if necessary) within the next few days. Ping me if I do not come > back! > > I have now at least checked the code in question. I actually overlooked > that problem. The current versions do not support ruleset queues in > new-style config. I hope to be able to look at a cure today.
I have now fixed it: http://git.adiscon.com/?p=rsyslog.git;a=commitdiff;h=62f6a7d7b4b3c9fee0fffea961a201d24a059b2c Read the commit comment - there is potential for users error when configuring this, but I think I will solve that in v7.3, as the regression potential is too large and the risk bearable (we had a similar issue for several years without bug reports). Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
