Hi Folks,

I just wanted to share the response I got from the RFC3339 authors (below). So 
our interpretation was correct. This means we need to add a config option for 
the non-standard behavior. I won't have time to do this until January. If it is 
not done by mid-January, pls ping me.

Rainer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Klyne [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 6:07 PM
> To: Rainer Gerhards
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: RFC3339, section 5.6
> 
> Dear Rainer,
> 
> As I recall, it was our intent to reduce the number of options compared
> with ISO
> 8601 (cf. section 5.5), so the answer to your question would be yes,
> offsets
> such as "+0600" or "+06" are not intended to be permitted by this
> specification.
> 
> #g
> --
> 
> On 13/12/2012 18:22, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> > Dear Chris and Graham:
> >
> > I hope you can spare a minute. 3339, sec. 5.6 says:
> >
> > time-numoffset  = ("+" / "-") time-hour ":" time-minute
> >
> > where as in appendix A (ISO-converted ABNF) it says:
> >
> > time-numoffset    = ("+" / "-") time-hour [[":"] time-minute]
> >
> > Do I correctly understand that 3339 places a further restriction on
> the ISO format and does NOT allow offsets like "+0600" or "+06"? This
> question came up when implementing RFC5424 which refers to 3339.
> >
> > Your answer would be deeply appreciated.
> >
> > My warmest regards,
> > Rainer Gerhards
> >
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to