> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Bradley > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:19 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [rsyslog] ZipLevel on forwarded messages requires rsyslog on > other end? > > Hi everyone > > I was thinking about possibly reducing the logging data volume that's > being transmitted by rsyslog. At the moment I have rsyslog on the log > clients, forwarding to logstash which filters and dumps into > elasticsearch. > I realise that there will be a performance penalty but it seems that > rsyslog is clever enough to only compress when it's going to make a > reasonable difference. > > If I wanted to use the ZipLevel option on my rsyslog forwarding action, > would I also need to have rsyslog on the other end to decode?
Yup, that's a non-standard extension. Rainer > Or would logstash be able to handle incoming log data that's been zip > compressed? > > Cheers, Ben > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a > myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST > if you DON'T LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
