That's great. I'll test it ASAP. :-)

Philippe Muller


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Rainer Gerhards
<[email protected]>wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards
> > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 9:48 AM
> > To: Philippe Muller
> > Cc: rsyslog-users ([email protected])
> > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Need help to understand RainerScript behavior
> (rsyslog
> > 7.2.6)
> >
> > Quick update: I have this in lab now. I can confirm the problem in
> 7.2.6, but it
> > seems to be gone in master branch (7.3.9+). Now need to dig down what's
> > going on.
>
> Yup, I accidently fixed the problem in 7.3 only. Here is the backport:
>
>
> http://git.adiscon.com/?p=rsyslog.git;a=commitdiff;h=cbf0ed9541fee2a480dda3533d1604a9df4ae9bb
>
> I'll release this with 7.2.7, hopefully very soon (there is another issue
> open that I would like to roll into the 7.2.7 release, otherwise I had
> released today).
>
> Philippe, if you have time to try out the patch, that would be great (but
> fully understandable if not;)). It worked in my lab with your config.
>
> Rainer
> >
> > Rainer
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Philippe Muller [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 11:40 AM
> > > To: Rainer Gerhards; rsyslog-users
> > > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Need help to understand RainerScript behavior
> > > (rsyslog
> > > 7.2.6)
> > >
> > > Not sure is it is related :
> > >
> > >
> > > I tried this configuration :
> > > ---
> > > if $app-name startswith "FOO-" then {
> > >     set $!appname_starts_with_FOO = 1;
> > >
> > >     if re_match($app-name, '^FOO-[^-]+-([012])$') then {
> > >         set $!appname_matches_regexp = 1;
> > >
> > >         if field($app-name, 45, 2) == "BAR" then {
> > >             set $!appname_2nd_field_is_BAR = 1;
> > >         } else {
> > >             set $!appname_2nd_field_isnt_BAR = 1;
> > >         }
> > >     } else {
> > >         set $!appname_doesnt_match_regexp = 1;
> > >     }
> > > } else {
> > >     set $!appname_doesnt_starts_with_FOO = 1; }
> > > ---
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is the rsyslog startup message :
> > > app-name: "rsyslogd", msg: " [origin software="rsyslogd"
> > swVersion="7.2.6"
> > > x-pid="28469" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] start", json: {
> > > "appname_2nd_field_isnt_BAR": 1, "appname_doesnt_match_regexp": 1,
> > > "appname_doesnt_starts_with_FOO": 1 }
> > >
> > > => This message should only have "appname_doesnt_starts_with_FOO" ;
> > > why are tests inside "if $app-name startswith ..." evaluated ?
> > >
> > > Message : logger -t foo test foo
> > >
> > > Result : app-name: "foo", msg: " test foo", json: {
> > > "appname_2nd_field_isnt_BAR": 1, "appname_doesnt_match_regexp": 1,
> > > "appname_doesnt_starts_with_FOO": 1 } => This message should only
> > have
> > > "appname_doesnt_starts_with_FOO"
> > >
> > >
> > > Message : logger -t FOO-bar test foo
> > >
> > > Result : app-name: "FOO-bar", msg: " test foo", json: {
> > > "appname_starts_with_FOO": 1, "appname_2nd_field_isnt_BAR": 1,
> > > "appname_doesnt_match_regexp": 1 }
> > >
> > > => Should only have "appname_starts_with_FOO" and
> > > "appname_doesnt_match_regexp"
> > >
> > >
> > > Message : logger -t FOO-BAR test foo
> > >
> > > Result : app-name: "FOO-BAR", msg: " test foo", json: {
> > > "appname_starts_with_FOO": 1, "appname_2nd_field_isnt_BAR": 1,
> > > "appname_doesnt_match_regexp": 1 }
> > >
> > > => Should only have "appname_starts_with_FOO" and
> > > "appname_doesnt_match_regexp"
> > >
> > >
> > > Message : logger -t FOO-BAR-0 test foo
> > >
> > > Result : app-name: "FOO-BAR-0", msg: " test foo", json: {
> > > "appname_starts_with_FOO": 1, "appname_matches_regexp": 1,
> > > "appname_2nd_field_is_BAR": 1 }
> > >
> > > => Works as expected
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Philippe Muller
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Philippe Muller
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >     Here is the full debug log : http://pastebin.com/SMtnZNuL
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >     Philippe Muller
> > >
> > >
> > >     On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Rainer Gerhards
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >             No, should work. Debug log?
> > >
> > >
> > >             Sent from phone, thus brief.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >             -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> > >             Von: Philippe Muller <[email protected]>
> > >             Datum: 28.03.2013 22:53 (GMT+01:00)
> > >             An: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
> > >             Betreff: Re: [rsyslog] Need help to understand RainerScript
> > behavior
> > > (rsyslog 7.2.6)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >             I guess using set-able variables in if-statement is not
> > supported.
> > >             Rainer : can you confirm that ?
> > >
> > >             Philippe Muller
> > >
> > >
> > >             On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Philippe Muller
> > >             <[email protected]>wrote:
> > >
> > >             > Hi rsyslog users,
> > >             >
> > >             > I try to define a scheme which gives users a way to
> chose if
> > > messages
> > >             > should be written on their server filesystem and if they
> > should be
> > >             > forwarded to syslog collectors.
> > >             >
> > >             > Here is my test configuration :
> > >             > ---
> > >             > module(load="imuxsock")
> > >             >
> > >             > # Default: All messages should be written locally
> > >             > set $!rsyslog_write = 1;
> > >             > # Default: All messages should be forwarded to collectors
> > >             > set $!rsyslog_forward = 1;
> > >             >
> > >             > # When a message with the custom tag is matched,
> > >             > # extract write and forwarding information.
> > >             > #
> > >             > # Tag syntax: FOO-appName-flag
> > >             > #
> > >             > # Flag values:
> > >             > # - 0: drop message
> > >             > # - 1: don't write message
> > >             > # - 2: don't forward message
> > >             > # - 3: write and forward message (default)
> > >             > #
> > >             > if re_match($app-name, "^FOO-[^-]+-([0123])") then {
> > >             >     set $!rsyslog_flag = cnum(field($app-name, 45, 3));
> > >             >     if $!rsyslog_flag == 0 then {
> > >             >         unset $!rsyslog_write;
> > >             >         unset $!rsyslog_forward;
> > >             >     } else if $!rsyslog_flag == 1 then {
> > >             >         unset $!rsyslog_write;
> > >             >     } else if $!rsyslog_flag == 2 then {
> > >             >         unset $!rsyslog_forward;
> > >             >     }
> > >             > }
> > >             >
> > >             > # Write all messages for debugging
> > >             > template(name="cee-debug" type="string" string="msg:
> > > \"%msg%\", json:
> > >             > %$!all-json%\n")
> > >             > action(name="cee-debug" type="omfile" file="/tmp/cee-
> > debug"
> > >             > template="cee-debug")
> > >             > ---
> > >             >
> > >             > And that's how I tested it :
> > >             > # logger -t FOO-bar-0 test-0
> > >             > # logger -t FOO-bar-1 test-1
> > >             > # logger -t FOO-bar-2 test-2
> > >             > # logger -t FOO-bar-3 test-3
> > >             > # cat /tmp/cee-debug
> > >             > msg: " test-0", json: { "rsyslog_write": 1,
> "rsyslog_forward":
> > > 1,
> > >             > "rsyslog_flag": 0 }
> > >             > msg: " test-1", json: { "rsyslog_write": 1,
> "rsyslog_forward":
> > > 1,
> > >             > "rsyslog_flag": 1 }
> > >             > msg: " test-2", json: { "rsyslog_write": 1,
> "rsyslog_forward":
> > > 1,
> > >             > "rsyslog_flag": 2 }
> > >             > msg: " test-3", json: { "rsyslog_write": 1,
> "rsyslog_forward":
> > > 1,
> > >             > "rsyslog_flag": 3 }
> > >             >
> > >             >
> > >             > Messages are matched by re_match(), $!rsyslog_flag is
> well
> > > extracted from
> > >             > the tag, but none of the tests on $!rsyslog_flag seem to
> be
> > > evaluated
> > >             > successfully.
> > >             > I tested the same config without cnum() + testing
> > $!rsyslog_flag
> > > with
> > >             > strings => same results.
> > >             >
> > >             > Is there something I'm missing regarding nested if
> > statements ?
> > >             > If that's the expected behavior, I would be grateful for
> > > clarification. :-)
> > >             >
> > >             >
> > >             > Regards,
> > >             >
> > >             > Philippe Muller
> > >             >
> > >
> > >             _______________________________________________
> > >             rsyslog mailing list
> > >             http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > >             http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > >             What's up with rsyslog? Follow
> https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> > >             NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are
> ARCHIVED
> > by a
> > > myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT
> > POST
> > > if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
> > >             _______________________________________________
> > >             rsyslog mailing list
> > >             http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > >             http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > >             What's up with rsyslog? Follow
> https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> > >             NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are
> ARCHIVED
> > by a
> > > myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT
> > POST
> > > if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsyslog mailing list
> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL:
> > This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites
> beyond
> > our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to